To push or to pull? A clinical audit on the efficacy and safety of the pull and push percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques in oncological patients.

BACKGROUND: The peroral "pull" technique and the direct "push" procedure are the two main methods for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. Although pull-PEG is generally recommended as the first-line modality, many oncological patients require a push-PEG approach to prevent tumor seeding or overcome tumor-related obstruction. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both PEG procedures in cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive PEG procedures within a tertiary oncological center. Patients were followed up with the hospital databases and National Cancer Registry to assess the technical success rate for PEG placement, the rate of minor and major adverse events (AEs), and 30-day mortality rates. We compared those outcomes between the two PEG techniques. Finally, risk factors for PEG-related adverse events were analyzed using a multivariable Cox proportional-hazard regression model adjusted for patients' sex, age, performance status (ECOG), Body Mass Index (BMI), diabetes, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) status (pre-/current-/post-treatment), and type of PEG. RESULTS: We included 1055 PEG procedures (58.7% push-PEG/41.4% pull-PEG) performed in 994 patients between 2014 and 2021 (mean age 62.0 [±10.7] yrs.; 70.2% males; indication: head-and-neck cancer 75.9%/other cancer 24.1%). The overall technical success for PEG placement was 96.5%. Although the "push" technique had a higher rate of all AEs (21.4% vs. 7.1%, Hazard Ratio [HR]  = 2.9; 95% CI = 1.9-4.3, p < 0.001), most of these constituted minor AEs (71.9%), such as tube dislodgement. The methods had no significant difference regarding major AEs and 30-day mortality rates. Previous CRT was associated with an increased risk of major AEs (hazard ratio = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.0-7.2, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: The risk of major AEs was comparable between the push- and pull-PEG techniques in cancer patients. Due to frequent tube dislodgement in push-PEG, the pull technique may be more suitable for long-term feeding. Previous CRT increases the risk of major AEs, favoring early ("prophylactic") PEG placement when such treatment is expected.

Thromboprophylaxis in Patients Admitted to the Surgical Ward: Clinical Audit.

Background: Hospital-acquired thrombosis (HAT) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and financial burden globally. Following trusted guidelines for VTE prevention has shown effective, safe, and satisfactory results. This prompts national collaborative efforts to maintain a consensus approach for the safe risk assessment of inpatients and the prescription of thromboprophylaxis. Objective: This study aimed to detect and estimate deviations from international thromboprophylaxis protocols. The study also aimed to raise the quality of practice and adherence to evidence-based protocols in Alshuhada Teaching Hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional audit of general surgical inpatients was performed from October 2021 to May 2022. The first cycle was from 1/10/2021 to 21/10/2021, and the second cycle was from 13/5/2022 to 31/5/2022. The target population was adults aged >18 years. Data were collected via an online checklist on two separate occasions. The criteria were based on the NICE guideline for venous thromboembolism in individuals aged over 16 years: "Reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism NG89". Results: Forty-five surgical inpatients were included in this study: 20 in the first cycle and 25 in the second cycle. The first-cycle report showed that only 25% of VTE candidates received this regimen. In the second cycle, practice significantly improved, with 92% of admitted patients having their risk assessment tool completed within 24 h of admission. 79% of VTE prophylaxis candidates were prescribed adequate pharmacological prophylaxis within 14 h of admission. Conclusion: The rate of adequate thromboprophylaxis for inpatients undergoing surgery was very low before clinicians received education on VTE prevention, whereas was evidently high after they had received them. The cause of non-adherence in the pre-intervention phase was a lack of adequate knowledge regarding the magnitude and burden of HAT and the importance of thromboprophylaxis, which has a potential role in preventing the majority of HAT.

Pre-Infusion Checklist For Rituximab In Pemphigus Vulgaris Patients: Clinical Audit.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether or not the pre-infusion checklist for rituximab was followed in patients of pemphigus vulgaris. Method: The audit, intervention and re-audit was conducted at the Dermatology Department, Medical Teaching Institution-Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan, and comprised in-patients of pemphigus vulgaris, confirmed by skin biopsy and immunofluorescence, who received rituximab between January 1 to March 31, 2022. The randomly picked cases were reviewed to check if the standard guidelines for rituximab prior to infusion had been followed. After completion of the first audit cycle, the medical team was give awareness about the latest pre infusion rituximab guidelines, and they were also provided with a checklist and consent form to implement the change. Re-audit was performed from May to July, 2022, using the same method to see if improvements had been made. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. RESULTS: Of the 20 cases evaluated against 16 parameters, the first audit showed 7(43.5%) parameters to have been met across all cases. Re-audit comprised another set of 20 cases, and showed that 15(93.75%) parameters had been applied across the board Pneumococcal and influenza vaccine was the only element 1(6.25%) not touching universal application. CONCLUSIONS: Re-audit showed major improvement in compliance with the standard guidelines.

The QuADRANT study: Current status and recommendations for improving uptake and implementation of clinical audit of medical radiological procedures in Europe. The radiotherapy perspective.

BACKGROUND: QuADRANT was a research project funded by the European Commission to evaluate clinical audit uptake and implementation across Europe, with an emphasis on clinical audit as mandated within the BSSD (Basic Safety Standards Directive). AIM: Focusing on the QuADRANT objectives - to obtain an overview of European clinical audit activity; identify good practices, resources, barriers and challenges; provide guidance and recommendations going forwards; identify the potential for European Union action on quality and safety focusing on the field of radiotherapy. RESULTS: A pan-European survey, expert interviews and a literature review conducted within the framework of the QuADRANT project indicated that developments in national clinical audit infrastructure are required. While in radiotherapy, there is a strong tradition and high level of experience of dosimetry audits and well-established practice through the IAEA's QUATRO audits, few countries have a well-established comprehensive clinical audit programme or international/national initiatives on tumour specific clinical audits. Even if sparse, the experience from countries with established system of quality audits can be used as role-models for national professional societies to promote clinical audit implementation. However, resource allocation and national prioritisation of clinical audit are needed in many countries. National and international societies should take the initiative to promote and facilitate training and resources (guidelines, experts, courses) for clinical audits. Enablers used to enhance clinical audit participation are not widely employed. Development of hospital accreditation programmes can facilitate clinical audit uptake. An active and formalised role for patients in clinical audit practice and policy development is recommended. Because there is a persisting variation in European awareness of BSSD clinical audit requirements, work is needed to improve dissemination of information on the legislative requirements relating to clinical audit in the BSSD and in relation to inspection processes. The aim is to ensure these include clinical audit and that they encompass all clinics and specialties involved in medical applications using ionising radiation. CONCLUSION: QuADRANT provided an overarching view of clinical audit practice in Europe, with all its related aspects. Unfortunately, it showed that the awareness of the BSSD requirements for clinical audit are highly variable. Therefore, there is an urgent need to dedicate efforts towards ensuring that regulatory inspections also incorporate an assessment of clinical audit program(s), affecting all aspects of clinical work and specialties involved in patient exposure to ionising radiation.

National Cancer Diagnosis Audits for England 2018 versus 2014: a comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Timely diagnosis of cancer in patients who present with symptoms in primary care is a quality-improvement priority. AIM: To examine possible changes to aspects of the diagnostic process, and its timeliness, before and after publication of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence's (2015) guidance on the referral of suspected cancer in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Comparison of findings from population-based clinical audits of cancer diagnosis in general practices in England for patients diagnosed in 2018 or 2014. METHOD: GPs in 1878 (2018) and 439 (2014) practices collected primary care information on the diagnostic pathway of cancer patients. Key measures including patient characteristics, place of presentation, number of pre-referral consultations, use of primary care investigations, and referral type were compared between the two audits by descriptive analysis and regression models. RESULTS: Among 64 489 (2018) and 17 042 (2014) records of a new cancer diagnosis, the percentage of patients with same-day referral (denoted by a primary care interval of 0 days) was higher in 2018 (42.7% versus 37.7%) than in 2014, with similar improvements in median diagnostic interval (36 days versus 40 days). Compared with 2014, in 2018: fewer patients had ≥3 pre-referral consultations (18.8% versus 26.2%); use of primary care investigations increased (47.9% versus 45.4%); urgent cancer referrals increased (54.8% versus 51.8%); emergency referrals decreased (13.4% versus 16.5%); and recorded use of safety netting decreased (40.0% versus 44.4%). CONCLUSION: In the 5-year period, including the year when national guidelines were updated (that is, 2015), there were substantial improvements to the diagnostic process of patients who present to general practice in England with symptoms of a subsequently diagnosed cancer.

Reinventing the Clinical Audit in a Pediatric Oncology Network.

Providing equal access to pediatric cancer patients regardless of their geographic location is a major goal of the Affiliate Program at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (St. Jude). Thirty-five percent of new cancer patients enrolled on St. Jude clinical trials reside in the communities of 1 of the 8 affiliate clinics, which serve 9 states in the Southeast and Midwest United States. The affiliate clinics support participant recruitment for clinical trials and the geographic extension of St. Jude clinical care. To ensure high-quality pediatric cancer care, we instituted on-site clinical audits, however, we did not see improvement in clinical outcomes including the time to antibiotics in febrile immunocompromised patients, consistent hand-off communication, consistent documentation of oral chemotherapy, and adherence to a central line bundle in the ambulatory setting. We then moved to a more comprehensive clinical audit which involved self-reflection of clinic staff members, transparent data sharing, development of local quality champions, and engagement of senior leaders. The comprehensive approach was more successful in improving clinical outcomes including the time to antibiotics, hand-off communication, documentation of oral chemotherapy administration, and adherence to a central line bundle in the ambulatory setting.

Retrospective audit in documentation practice in surgical inpatients records, a two cycles audit.

BACKGROUND: To provide safe and effective patient care, records must be kept in a high-quality manner. Clinical audits should be conducted on a frequent basis to ensure that high standards of record-keeping are upheld. An audit and re-audit of the surgical inpatient records' documentation were conducted as part of a retrospective, descriptive study to see if it aligns with the hospital's stated policy. AIMS/OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the hospital's present documentation process and considering how current practice could be improved were the key objectives of the audit project. METHOD: An interactive form was created to audit the criteria using standard hospital guidelines as a foundation. Retrospective analysis of 120 case files served as the main source for the information gathered. The documentation in the records was evaluated to determine whether it was accurate and complete in every section. The data was collected, analyzed, and presented at clinical governance. These outcomes were implemented in our documentation protocol in a way that all surgical personnel are given instructions on the appropriate documentation and how to complete it. This data was again, prospectively collected to complete the audit cycle. RESULTS: Thirty-five of the 37 relevant audit standards witnessed an increase in compliance. No standard or criterion's compliance dropped during the re-audit cycle. Since the first audit cycle, compliance has increased on average by 32% across all audit criteria, suggesting that some of the work done after the first cycle has had a significant effect. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Record-keeping must be considered as an integral part of medical practice; current documentation work demonstrates that when performed appropriately, audit can actually affect the quality of clinical records. The audit itself can increase awareness of the need for practice improvement. The distribution of findings, instruction, training, and local action planning are all essential for developing practice.

Quest to Improve Management of Prostate Cancer in West Africa: Development of a Clinical Audit Tool.

In 2010 and during the following decade, two guidelines were published for the management of prostate cancer in West Africa. A key recommendation of the guidelines was the need for the development of a Clinical Audit Tool which should help surgeons and institutions to identify the gaps between the recommended standards and current practice. In this paper, a Clinical Audit Tool, WAPCAT, was developed to facilitate and implement the audit process for the management of Prostate cancer in a West African healthcare institution.

En 2010 et au cours de la décennie suivante, deux directives ont été publiées pour la gestion du cancer de la prostate en Afrique de l'Ouest. Une recommandation clé de ces directives était la nécessité de développer un outil d'audit clinique qui devrait aider les chirurgiens et les institutions à identifier les écarts entre les normes recommandées et la pratique actuelle. Dans cet article, un outil d'audit clinique, le WAPCAT, a été développé pour faciliter et mettre en œuvre le processus d'audit pour la gestion du cancer de la prostate dans un établissement de santé d'Afrique de l'Ouest. Mots clés: Cancer de la prostate, Audit clinique, La norme, Outil d'audit, Afrique de l'Ouest.

Variation in ovarian cancer care in Australia: An analysis of patterns of care in diagnosis and initial treatment in New South Wales.

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality of all gynaecological cancers. This study aimed to identify the extent to which women across New South Wales experienced variation in their care in diagnosis and initial treatment for ovarian cancer against the national optimal care pathway for ovarian cancer. METHOD: Clinical audit methodology was utilised to explore variations for women with primary ovarian cancer; 171 eligible cases were identified through by the NSW Cancer Registry for the period of 1 March 2017 to 28 February 2018. RESULTS: Limited variation was detected with 86% of women being reviewed by a specialist gynaecological oncology multidisciplinary team; 54% of women received their first treatment within 28 days of their first specialist appointment, 66% of women having their first surgery completed by a gynaecological oncologist and 45% of women received their first treatment in a specialist gynaecological oncology hospital. CONCLUSION: Deviation from effective ovarian cancer care is apparent particularly in the location and timeliness of first treatment, with implications for the quality of care received and care outcomes. Understanding factors that contribute to variation is critical to ensure optimal and appropriate ovarian cancer care and to tackle systemic barriers to the provision of effective care.

A psycho-educational intervention for the prevention of foot lesions in people with diabetes: Report of a clinical audit.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Motivational approaches may help target the psychological aspects of self-care, improving adherence to good practices in individuals with diabetes. The present study was designed to test the feasibility and effectiveness of a psychoeducational program for diabetic foot prevention or disease progression. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-one subjects with or at high risk of foot ulcer development entered a program consisting of six 120-min group sessions, conducted by a podiatrist and an expert in psycho-education. Occurrence/recurrence of lesions in a 3-year follow-up was compared with 172 cases with similar risk score (IWGDF score 2019), receiving education at any 6-month podiatric visit (standard-of-care). Motivation to self-care and competence were assessed by specific questionnaires. The experimental program increased adherence to follow-up. The prevalence of foot lesions was higher at baseline and was remarkably reduced at any time-point in patients attending the psychoeducational program, whereas it remained relatively stable in standard care (around 10% of cases). The cumulative incidence was lower in the psychoeducational program (13.2, 95% CI 9.2-18.0 per 100 patient-year vs. 26.1; 95% CI 22.1-30.2); time to new lesions was increased (P = 0.022). Cox proportional hazard analysis confirmed an overall reduction of lesions in the psychoeducational program (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.18-0.66; P < 0.001), after adjustment for confounders. The program was associated with significant changes in competence and motivation to self-care. CONCLUSION: A psychoeducational approach is both feasible and effective to support patients with diabetes at high risk of first or recurrent foot lesions, increasing their adherence to self-care practices.

Prescribing clozapine in the UK: Quality improvement issues identified by clinical audit.

INTRODUCTION: The Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health initiated a quality improvement (QI) programme on clozapine use in UK mental health services. METHODS: Clinical audits conducted in 2019 and 2021. RESULTS: Sixty-three participating NHS Trusts/healthcare organisations in 2019, and 61 in 2021, submitted treatment data for 6948 and 8155 patients, respectively. In both audits, high-dose and/or combined antipsychotic medications had been prescribed immediately before initiating clozapine in over a quarter of patients recently started on clozapine. In patients who were tobacco smokers and recently discharged from a smoke-free ward, the impact of the potential change in smoking status had been considered in the care plans of just under one-third in 2019 and just over a half in 2021. For community patients, their Summary Care Records (SCRs) included their clozapine prescriptions in 58% of cases in 2019 and 72% in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Three QI issues were identified. (1) Antipsychotic regimens with limited evidence for efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia were prescribed for over a quarter of cases before starting clozapine. Use of such strategies may delay clozapine treatment, potentially reducing the likelihood of a therapeutic response. (2) While anticipation of the consequences of a change in smoking status on plasma clozapine concentration following discharge from hospital showed improvement over time, even in 2021 it was not evident for nearly a half of relevant cases. (3) While inclusion of clozapine in the SCR also improved over time, even in 2021 it was missing for more than a quarter of community patients.

Gynaecological cancer pathway for faster cancer treatment: a repeat clinical audit.

AIMS: This clinical audit aimed to review cancer management pathways for patients with gynaecological cancers in Northland in order to evaluate whether there has been an improvement compared to previous audit periods and look for differences between ethnicities. METHODS: 186 Northland patients with a new diagnosis of gynaecological cancer were discussed at the Auckland gynaecology-oncology multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020. Patient demographics and data pertaining to cancer care was collected and compared to datapoints set out in the original audit, derived from the Ministry of Health Faster Cancer Treatment (FCT) targets and standards of service provision. RESULTS: 89.2% of patients had their first treatment within 31 days of treatment decision, and 66.9% had their first treatment within 62 days of referral, an improvement compared to previous audit periods. Wait times were shorter but there were still delays in obtaining histology, MDM discussion and receiving treatment. There were also differences between treatment locations, as well as between Maori and non-Maori. CONCLUSIONS: There has been an overall improvement in gynaecological cancer service provision for Northland patients. However, outcomes still fall short of the national FCT targets and there are on-going disparities between Maori and non-Maori.

Estimating excess visual loss from neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective clinical audit and simulation model.

OBJECTIVES: To report the reduction in new neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) referrals during the COVID-19 pandemic and estimate the impact of delayed treatment on visual outcomes at 1 year. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical audit and simulation model. SETTING: Multiple UK National Health Service (NHS) ophthalmology centres. PARTICIPANTS: Data on the reduction in new nAMD referrals were obtained from four NHS Trusts comparing April 2020 with April 2019. To estimate the potential impact on 1-year visual outcomes, a stratified bootstrap simulation model was developed drawing on an electronic medical records dataset of 20 825 nAMD eyes from 27 NHS Trusts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Simulated mean visual acuity and proportions of eyes with vision ≤6/60, ≤6/24 and ≥6/12 at 1 year under four hypothetical scenarios: 0-month, 3-month, 6-month and 9-month treatment delays. Estimated additional number of eyes with vision ≤6/60 at 1 year nationally. RESULTS: The number of nAMD referrals dropped on average by 72% (range 65%-87%). Simulated 1-year visual outcomes for 1000 nAMD eyes with a 3-month treatment delay suggested an increase in the proportion of eyes with vision ≤6/60 from 15.5% (13.2%-17.9%) to 23.3% (20.7%-25.9%), and a decrease in the proportion of eyes with vision ≥6/12 (driving vision) from 35.1% (32.1%-38.1%) to 26.4% (23.8%-29.2%). Outcomes worsened incrementally with longer modelled delays. Assuming nAMD referrals are reduced to this level for 1 month nationally, these simulated results suggest an additional 186-365 eyes with vision ≤6/60 at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: We report a large decrease in nAMD referrals during the COVID-19 lockdown and provide an important public health message regarding the risk of delayed treatment. As a conservative estimate, a treatment delay of 3 months could lead to a >50% relative increase in the number of eyes with vision ≤6/60 and 25% relative decrease in the number of eyes with driving vision at 1 year.

Are we staying up too late? Timing of surgery of displaced supracondylar fractures in children. Clinical audit in a paediatric tertiary UK trauma centre and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines in managing supracondylar humerus fractures in children, outline indications for urgent fixation of these fractures. We present our data from a regional paediatric trauma centre before and after implementing a change in practice as per these guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective clinical audit against BOA guidelines. Radiographs, admission clerking notes, operation notes, and clinic letters were all reviewed. We included all displaced supracondylar fractures of the extension type (Gartland Types 2b and 3). The first audit cycle occurred in 2017, subsequent cycles in 2018 & 2019. RESULTS: 172 patients reviewed across the three audit stages. In the first audit, almost quarter of patients were operated on in the same night without clear indication as per the guidelines. This dropped down to 7% after a change of practice in 2019. Rate of conversion to open reduction and nerve complications did not increase after delayed fixation. CONCLUSION: When there is no indication for same night operating out of hours, delaying treatment until the next day seems to be a safe way of treating these difficult fractures. Our data show that there is no increase in complications when these fractures are managed the next day.

Opioids in advanced lung malignancy: a clinical audit of opioid prescription, patient education and safeguarding.

BACKGROUND: Opioids have an important role in symptom management for people with advanced cancer. Clinical guidelines recommend patient education to ensure the safe use of opioids; however, no Australian studies have explored current education and safeguarding practices when opioids are initiated to advanced cancer patients. AIMS: To investigate risk assessment, safeguarding and education practices when opioids are first prescribed to advanced lung cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective medical record audit of outpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer seen at a tertiary Australian hospital between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019 and prescribed strong opioids for cancer-related symptoms. RESULTS: Of 1022 patients attending the lung cancer clinic, 205 were newly initiated on an opioid. Opioid-related risks including previous recreational drug use (28; 13.6%) and history of falls (16; 7.9%) were infrequently documented. Opioid-related safeguards and adverse effects management were variably instituted: written general practitioner correspondence at opioid initiation (62; 30%), clinic follow up (186; 91%) and laxative co-prescription (55; 26.8%). Most patients (137; 66.8%) received no documented opioid education on drug initiation. There was no association between age (P = 0.653), number of comorbidities (P = 0.569) or chronic alcohol use (P = 0.263) and the provision of education on opioid initiation. Palliative care doctors or nurse practitioners were eight times more likely to document opioid education than medical oncologists (odds ratio = 8.5; confidence interval = 2.9-24.8; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Guideline-recommended risk assessment, safeguards and patient education were infrequently documented when opioids were initiated. Clinician training, decision-assist prompts in electronic prescribing software and written education resources for patients may address these gaps in care.

Clinical audit of retinoblastoma management: a retrospective single-institution study.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to identify the frequency of death, metastasis, enucleation, and use of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) among retinoblastoma patients. The secondary aim was to determine whether any events were associated with suboptimal clinical management to identify areas for clinical care improvement. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with retinoblastoma between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, at The Hospital for Sick Children were included. Medical records of eligible patients underwent a comprehensive 2-part review. First, a chart review collected diagnostic details, treatment course, and occurrence of 4 events: death, metastasis, use of EBRT, and enucleation. Next, events were reviewed in detail, and a multidisciplinary committee reached consensus on cases managed suboptimally. RESULTS: The study included 209 patients (292 eyes). There were 8 deaths, 11 metastases, 177 enucleations (143 primary, 34 secondary), and 8 uses of EBRT. Thirteen patients were reviewed by the multidisciplinary committee, which confirmed that 5 of these patients had events associated with suboptimal clinical management. Three patients developed metastases leading to death (misdiagnosis and mismanagement of trilateral retinoblastoma [1], parental refusal of enucleation [1], and inaccurate histopathology after primary enucleation [1]). One patient developed extraocular extension related to scleral invasion following aggressive focal therapy. One patient underwent secondary enucleation for a Group B eye related to mismanagement of a treatment complication. DISCUSSION: Deaths, metastases, and enucleations with documented instances of suboptimal care highlighted a need to enhance medical team and patient communication, histopathology interpretation, laser treatment guidelines, and trilateral retinoblastoma management. Routine clinical audit of retinoblastoma management can identify areas for clinical practice change.

Clinical audit of current Helicobacter pylori treatment outcomes in Singapore.

Introduction: H. pylori eradication reduces the risk of gastric malignancies and peptic ulcer disease. First-line therapies include 14-day PAC (proton pump inhibitor [PPI], amoxicillin, clarithromycin) and PBMT (PPI, bismuth, metronidazole, tetracycline). Second-line therapies include 14-day PBMT and PAL (PPI, amoxicillin, levofloxacin). This clinical audit examined current treatment outcomes in Singapore. Methods: Clinical data of H. pylori-positive patientswho underwent empirical first- and second-line eradication therapies from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2018 were reviewed. Treatment success was determined by 13C urea breath test performed at least 4 weeks after treatment and 2 weeks off PPI. Results: A total of 963 patients (862 PAC, 36 PMC [PPI, metronidazole, clarithromycin], 18 PBMT, 13 PBAC [PAC with bismuth], 34 others) and 98 patients (62 PMBT, 15 PAL, 21 others) received first-and second-line therapies respectively. A 14-day treatment duration was appropriately prescribed for first- and second-line therapies in 65.2% and 82.7% of patients, respectively. First-line treatment success rates were noted for PAC (seven-day: 76.9%, ten-day: 88.3%, 14-day: 92.0%), PMC (seven-day: 0, ten-day: 75.0%, 14-day: 69.8%), PBMT (ten-day: 100%, 14-day: 87.5%) and PBAC (14-day: 100%). 14-day treatment was superior to seven-day treatment (90.8% vs. 71.4%; P = 0.028). PAC was superior to PMC (P < 0.001) but similar to PBMT (P = 0.518) and PBAC (P = 0.288) in 14-day therapies. 14-day second-line PAL and PBMT had similar efficacy (90.9% vs. 82.4%; P = 0.674). Conclusion: First-line empirical treatment using PAC, PBMT and PBAC for 14 days had similar efficacy. Success rates for second-line PBMT and PAL were similar.

Clinical Audit of Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Adolescents and Adults with Medulloblastoma.

Purpose: Medulloblastomas, comprising 20%-25% of all primary brain tumors in children are much rarer in adulthood. Disease biology varies substantially across different age groups; however, owing to rarity, adults with medulloblastoma are traditionally treated using pediatric protocols. This is a retrospective audit of adolescent and adult medulloblastoma from a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: Data regarding demography, clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, histopathological features, molecular profiling, risk stratification, treatment details, and outcomes were retrieved from medical records. All time-to-event outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis of relevant prognostic factors was done with p value <0.05 being considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 162 patients ≥15 years of age with medulloblastoma were included. The median age was 25 years (range: 15-59 years) with leptomeningeal metastases seen in 31 (19%) patients at initial diagnosis. Following surgery, patients were treated with appropriate risk-stratified adjuvant therapy comprising of craniospinal irradiation plus boost with or without systemic chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 50 months, 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival and overall survival were 53.5% and 59.5%, respectively. The addition of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy did not impact upon survival in standard-risk medulloblastoma. High-risk (HR) disease and anaplastic histology emerged as significant and independent predictors of poor survival on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Medulloblastoma is a rare tumor in adolescents and adults with key differences in disease biology and resultant outcomes compared with the pediatric population. Contemporary management comprising maximal safe resection followed by appropriate risk-stratified adjuvant therapy provides acceptable survival outcomes.

The Value of On-Site Proton Audits.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to highlight the value and key findings of on-site proton audits. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The authors performed 38 on-site measurement-based peer reviews of proton centers participating in National Cancer Institute-funded clinical trials. The reviews covered beam calibration, lateral and depth measurements, mechanical checks, treatment planning and clinical practice, and quality assurance (QA) practices. Program deficiencies were noted, and recommendations were made about ways institutions could improve their practices. RESULTS: Institutions received an average of 3 (range, 1-8) recommendations for practice improvements. The number of deficiencies did not decrease over time, highlighting the continued need for this type of peer review. The most common deficiencies were for Task Group-recommended QA compliance (97% of centers), computed tomography number (CTN) to relative linear stopping power conversion (59%), and QA procedures (53%). In addition, 32% of institutions assessed failed at least 1 lateral beam profile measurement (<90% of pixels passing 3% [global]/3 mm; 10% threshold), despite passing internal QA measurements. These failures occurred for several different plan configurations (large, small, shallow, and deep targets) and at different depths in the beam path (proximal to target, central, and distal). CTN to relative linear stopping power conversion curves showed deviations at low, mid, and high CTNs and highlighted areas of inconsistency between proton centers, with many centers falling outside of 2 sigma of the mean curve of their peers. All deficiencies from the peer review were discussed with the institutions, and many implemented dosimetric treatment planning and practice changes to improve the accuracy of their system and consistency with other institutions. CONCLUSIONS: This peer review program has been integral in confirming and promoting consistency and best practice across proton centers for clinical trials, minimizing deviations for outcomes data.